Room:

Room size:

Included

    Not included

      • * Additional services not included in the price

      Reviews on the The Commodore 4 STARS

        CL  portswood road, portswood square, 8002  Cape town, Cape town-garden route, south africaView mapCLportswood road, portswood square, cape town-garden route, 8002, south africa Latitude: -33.905916499999996; Longitude: 18.417084299999999
      Return to the hotel details
      -33.905916499999996018.4170842999999990
      The Commodore
      Score3.2/5of 3 
      • Room
         
        2.7 / 5
      • Facilities
         
        3.0 / 5
      • Cleanliness
         
        3.7 / 5
      • Quality of the food
         
        4.0 / 5
      • Staff professionalism
         
        3.7 / 5
      • Price-quality ratio
         
        2.3 / 5
      100% REAL COMMENTS
      Real opinions of real clients

      (*) Additional services not included in the price.

      3 opinions about The Commodore

      Sort by
      • The Commodore3.3/5

        Partner

        stevePublished  2019-11-07

        Positive review

        great location good sized room good choice at breakfast

        Negative review

        staff friendliness not told at breakfast that toast and poached egg was a special order from the kitchen my husband was asked 3 times if he wanted a top up of tea and I was just ignored! noisy heater in room on the first morning we thought that we had left the tap running but it was next doors shower. noisy drain cleaning outside of our room we had come from the Hilton in the Bo Kaap area of Cape Town and this was far better than the Commodore which really surprised me. All of the staff had a smile and the breakfast was amazing at the Hilton. If I am honest we were a little disappointed with the Commodore.

      • The Commodore4.0/5

        Partner

        LauraPublished  2019-06-15

        Positive review

        Very good location and good WiFi.

        Negative review

        None

      • The Commodore2.3/5

        Alone

        AnonymousPublished  2013-06-03

        Negative review

        Too old dated